A recent article and subsequent reader discussion emphasize that human code review serves a broader purpose than mere bug detection, functioning primarily as a tool for team collaboration, architectural defense, and shared system comprehension. While some engineers argue that manual reviews will become a bottleneck in the era of AI-generated code, others defend the practice as essential for liability shielding, validating test coverage, and evaluating overall deployment strategies. Ultimately, the debate highlights that effective code review is about assessing the broader problem-solving approach and team alignment rather than just scrutinizing the code itself.