news
114

A recent discussion on Fil-C's memory-safe inline assembly highlights a debate over its choice to use runtime panics instead of compile-time errors for unsafe code, which critics argue merely delays crashes to production. However, supporters defend the approach as a practical way to port legacy C applications without full rewrites, noting that the feature's implementation was notably accelerated by using AI to parse x86_64 assembly.

Only full members can comment

Log in to express your opinion.

No comments yet.