news
72

A discussion around Herb Sutter’s piece on the rift between C++’s creator and its stewards highlights growing doubts about C++’s future, with commenters citing memory safety, AI-assisted rewrites, and weak safe-concurrency support as reasons legacy C++ may be increasingly hard to defend. Others credit Sutter and the C++ committee for foundational work on concurrency and memory models, while debating whether those efforts made parallel programming meaningfully easier.

Only full members can comment

Log in to express your opinion.

No comments yet.